Calculations using range-separated TD-DFTB#
In DFT there are a variety of exchange-correlation functionals, for example the local density approximation (LDA) or various gradient corrected functionals (GGA). Functionals that mix pure DFT and HF, so-called hybrid functionals are widely used in chemistry and physics. A new member of the club are the range-separated (or long-range corrected) functionals that combine pure DFT for short electron-electron distance with HF at longer distance. Conventional DFTB is based on the GGA, while ground and excited state calculations for range-separated functionals are now also available in DFTB+. The corresponding method is named LC-DFTB.
You will need a recent version of DFTB+ (>= 21) to perform the calculations in this section.
Benzene-Tetracyanoethylene dimer (TD-DFTB)#
[Input: recipes/linresp/range-separated/td-dftb]
Let us first do a conventional TD-DFTB calculation for the dimer of tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) and a benzene molecule to show the difference between both approaches. Here is the relevant part of the input:
Hamiltonian = DFTB {
SCC = Yes
SCCTolerance = 1.0E-10
MaxAngularMomentum = {
N = "p"
C = "p"
H = "s"
}
SlaterKosterFiles = Type2FileNames {
Prefix = "../../../slakos/download/mio/mio-1-1/"
Separator = "-"
Suffix = ".skf"
}
}
ExcitedState {
Casida {
NrOfExcitations = 10
Symmetry = Singlet
Diagonaliser = Stratmann {SubSpaceFactor = 30}
}
}
We are loading here the mio Slater-Koster files, which have been
generated using the GGA functional PBE. Note the new entry
Diagonalizer
in the Casida block. Besides the default Arpack
diagonalizer also the Stratmann
algorithm may be used for the
diagonalization of the response matrix. For small systems like the
present one, the Stratmann
option is very often faster.
The output in EXC.DAT looks like follows:
w [eV] Osc.Str. Transition Weight KS [eV] Sym.
================================================================================
2.033 0.00000000 37 -> 38 1.000 2.033 S
2.035 0.00000031 36 -> 38 1.000 2.035 S
3.162 0.00000000 35 -> 38 1.000 3.162 S
3.164 0.00000000 34 -> 38 1.000 3.164 S
4.346 0.00000054 32 -> 38 1.000 4.346 S
4.524 0.39252514 33 -> 38 1.000 3.442 S
4.570 0.00000000 31 -> 38 1.000 4.570 S
4.573 0.00000000 30 -> 38 1.000 4.573 S
4.881 0.00000000 29 -> 38 1.000 4.881 S
4.897 0.00000000 28 -> 38 1.000 4.897 S
The lowest excited state at 2.033 eV corresponds to the HOMO->LUMO transition. We can visualize these orbitals using waveplot (see First steps with Waveplot) to obtain more information on the nature of this state (Figure 21 and Figure 22).
We see that the lowest excited state is of charge transfer type, in which an electron is excited from the donor (benzene) to the acceptor (TCNE). TD-DFT using GGA functionals typically strongly underestimates such states, and this is also the case for TD-DFTB.
Benzene-Tetracyanoethylene dimer (TD-LC-DFTB)#
[Input: recipes/linresp/range-separated/td-lc-dftb]
We now repeat the calculation using the TD-LC-DFTB method. The input looks like this:
Geometry = GenFormat {
<<< "in.gen"
}
Driver = {}
Hamiltonian = DFTB {
SCC = Yes
SCCTolerance = 1.0E-10
MaxAngularMomentum = {
N = "p"
C = "p"
H = "s"
}
SlaterKosterFiles = Type2FileNames {
Prefix = "../../../slakos/download/ob2/ob2-1-1/shift/"
Separator = "-"
Suffix = ".skf"
}
RangeSeparated = LC {
Screening = MatrixBased {}
}
}
ExcitedState {
Casida {
NrOfExcitations = 10
Symmetry = Singlet
Diagonaliser = Stratmann {SubSpaceFactor = 30}
}
}
TD-LC-DFTB requires special Slater-Koster files that have been
generated for range-separated functionals. We are loading the ob2
set here. The block RangeSeparated
invokes the LC-DFTB method for
the ground state. Several algorithms to speed up the calculation are
available (see manual), we are choosing the MatrixBased
algorithm
here which involves no approximations. The ExcitedState
section
requires no changes, although the Stratmann
diagonalizer is
mandatory for TD-LC-DFTB. As you will recognize, the calculation is
slower than the previous TD-DFTB job. You can play with the parameter
SubSpaceFactor
(c.f. manual) to see the influence on the execution
time.
Let us now investigate the output (EXC.DAT) of the job:
w [eV] Osc.Str. Transition Weight KS [eV] Sym.
================================================================================
4.287 0.00000000 37 -> 38 1.000 6.748 S
4.290 0.00000013 36 -> 38 1.000 6.751 S
4.930 0.51883432 33 -> 38 1.000 7.719 S
4.962 0.00000101 35 -> 38 1.000 7.389 S
4.963 0.00000002 34 -> 38 1.000 7.391 S
5.257 0.00000000 32 -> 38 1.000 9.063 S
5.263 0.00000000 29 -> 38 1.000 9.117 S
5.595 0.00000000 28 -> 38 1.000 9.377 S
5.860 0.00000000 27 -> 38 1.000 9.646 S
6.018 0.00000000 24 -> 38 0.999 9.790 S
The lowest excited state is shifted from 2.033 eV (TD-DFTB) to 4.287 eV (TD-LC-DFTB). If you visualize the relevant molecular orbitals with waveplot, you can verify that the nature of the state is indeed unchanged, but the severe underestimation is corrected!